Wreck-conciliation or reconciliation? Ben Pfahlert

Ben Pfahlert

Reconciliation is a hot topic. It always has been and it always will be. In the first century AD, Paul wrote about reconciling Jews and Gentiles (Eph 2:11-22). In the 20th-century, the nation of South Africa created the ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ to deal with the atrocities of apartheid. The Australian Government is only now ‘reconciling’ with the indigenous population.

Reconciliation has been and always will be a burning issue so long as someone (or some people) sins against another (or others). Whenever there is a sin, a sinner and a slighted one (i.e. the one who is sinned against), reconciliation will be necessary.

But what I find very interesting is that people are often better at commentating reconciliation than they are at doing it. It's a bit like sport: Barry sits at home on the couch, shaking his head at Grant Hackett's ‘lacklustre performance’ in the 1500m freestyle, blissfully unaware of the fact that he himself couldn't swim 50 metres if his life depended on it.

Human beings talk ad nauseum about reconciliation, but do we actually do it? What happens in people's homes? Do we work hard at repairing relationships when we damage them? Do people reconcile well in the workplace?

Do we practice wreck-conciliation or reconciliation?

Australian wreck-conciliation

Sadly, Australians practise wreck-conciliation. Why do I say that? Well, firstly, we find it hard to admit sin sincerely, let alone articulate an apology. We're experts in ‘hollow sorrow’. Tell me if some of these statements sound familiar: “I'm sorry that you feel upset by what I said John; I didn't mean to belittle you”; “I'm sorry Jenny if I've caused offense”. Our apologies are lame. We don't take responsibility for our actions. If you examine the two apologies above, you'll realize that they're not apologies, they're veiled accusations. The apologists are implying that John and Jenny are petty to have even felt slighted. My wife Emma and I have a little joke in our marriage to add humour into our apologies. I sometimes say, “Emma I was rrrrrrr ... I was rrrrrrr ... I was wwrrrrrrrong!”

The second contributing factor to Aussie wreck-conciliation is the failure to ask for forgiveness. Even if we are having a bumper day of humility and we say, “Bill, I'm sorry we didn't pay your invoice on time”, we haven't reconciled. All we have done is communicated our sin. We've told the ‘slighted’ person that we feel sorry about the transgression. It is an emotional declaration but it isn't necessarily repentance. Godly sorrow requires repentance (2 Cor 7:10).

The third contributor to wreck-conciliation in Australian relationships is the failure to forgive. Imagine a person—say, a child—who actually does take responsibility for their sin and approaches their Dad to apologize. What common response do they get? “Son, don't say sorry. Don't do it again.” They walk away without forgiveness, but worse than that, they are unreconciled and burdened. Now they've got to be perfect to get Dad's acceptance.

Christian reconciliation

So what's the way forward? How do we practise garden-variety reconciliation? Reconciliation requires three As:

  • The transgressor must make an admission of sin—out loud, with words, to the person who's been slighted.
  • The transgressor then needs to ask for forgiveness (from God as well: 2 Sam 12:13).
  • The one slighted then needs to offer absolution: they need to forgive the transgressor.

Let me give you an example. I was at a barbecue the other day, talking to one of my friends. My 4-year-old son Edmund came up to ask me a question. He said, “Excuse me, Daddy”, and I failed to respond. He said it a second time, a third time and then finally started crying in exasperation. I looked down because the noise was unavoidable, and asked with a frustrated voice, “What's wrong, Edmund?”—words to which he cried even louder. Emma then said, “Ben, he's been trying to get your attention for quite a while”. I realized my sin and my need to reconcile with Edmund. I then got down on my haunches and said, “Edmund, were you trying to get Daddy's attention?” He nodded through the tears. I then said to him, “Edmund, I am sorry that I did not listen to you when you were speaking to me. I was selfish. I'm sorry I did that. Will you please forgive me?” Edmund replied, “Yes, Daddy”.

Reconciliation needs the three As. This is the way the gospel works out in relationship. We need to admit our sin before God the Father (Rom 3:10-12), we need to ask him to forgive us through the blood of Jesus Christ (1 Pet 3:18), and words of assurance like John 3:36 tell us that we're forgiven, absolved by God and reconciled to him.

2 Comments »

Stephen Jackson13/05/2008 10:21 AM

Ben,

Good to see a blog that addresses the burning social issue of our times, namely our relationship with australia’s indigenous peoples.

I agree with the perspective that it is the dominant culture (transgressor in your language) that is required to overcome the narrowness of their position to admit to the reality of history, and their hand in it.

Equally so, it is incumbent on the transgressed to show grace and accept an apology.  In my experience and frequent dealings with aboriginal people at the grass roots level, they are more than prepared to do this.  In a sense, they are “new wine ready for new wineskins”, ready to engage in constructive, collaborative relationship building. 

Sadly, this dynamic is not always reflected in the leadership of both sides. 

However, hope springs eternal, and the recent Federal Govt apology to the stolen generation is a great start in ‘naming some realities’, rather than ‘blaming the realities’.

Jesus is reported to have said that he came not for the strong, but for the weak.  In our times, we need to recognise that we are the strong dominant culture, and indigenous australians have a significantly weaker position in our society.  Our challenge is to hear the call of Jesus to respond to this gross power differential.

Keep the social focus coming!  It is the work of the Spirit!

Hi Ben,

Wreck-conciliation certainly is not unique to Aussie land.

I have also noticed here in South Africa that apologies are usually pushed back on the victim as you described. “I’m sorry you got hurt” and others.

People are actually sorry that got caught out, and are not really sorry for having done wrong. When people can admit to their sin, like you said, it would be a great step forward.

However, in our culture today, it seems that everybody is a victim and no-one wants to take responsibility for their actions.

Great post!

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
MiniZines

Sponsors

Briefing cover

The Sola Panel

The Briefing

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Karen Beilharz on A Vine confabulation

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Current discussions

RSS logo

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 (12 comments)

A Vine confabulation (3 comments)

God, the universe and all that: Part 2 (1 comment)

Temptation and the garden (0 comments)

God, the universe and all that: Part 5 (0 comments)

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

Temptation and the garden by Jean Williams (0 comments). All our temptations are garden temptations. I don't usually talk much about gardening when I lead Bible studies, but … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 5 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In this fifth and final instalment of his five-part series, Lionel Windsor reveals what the solution to … more

Experiencing God by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). If you've just joined us, in these Saturday posts we've been looking at classics from The Briefing archive … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 4 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In the fourth instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor uncovers the answer to the riddle. (Read … more

A Vine confabulation by Ian Carmichael (3 comments). We at Matthias Media have recently made available a free and downloadable discussion guide for Col Marshall and Tony Payne's … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 by Lionel Windsor (12 comments). In the third instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor discovers we humans are significant in the … more

Kids@church/Click: Some great material for your children’s Sunday School by Jean Williams (0 comments). I teach Sunday School for children regularly, but I don't always have the time and energy to write my … more

Experiencing confusion by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). I mentioned in my last Saturday post that for the next little while, we would be looking at … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 2 by Lionel Windsor (1 comment). In the second instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor contemplates the extent of our significance in … more

Stark treatment of the Crusades by Peter Bolt (2 comments). Revisionist history is probably as common as it is unethical. There are lessons to learn from the past, but … more

Ministry partners