Death in Romans
Did you know that his Letter to the Romans contains about half of all Paul’s references to death and dying?
For various reasons—mainly being committed to a team pulpit ministry—I didn't preach this Easter weekend. Or rather, my Easter sermon was delivered last Wednesday at our monthly mid-week friendship service to 21 precious frail-aged seniors (the oldest was 101 years old) and their helpers (all women!).
And so, apart from another important preaching task (helping prepare a kids’ talk for Good Friday), I’ve had a little more time than usual in the run up to Easter to ponder.
Hence my musings on death and dying in Romans.
Now, far be it from me to improve on Paul’s arrangement of his material. But for my own meditation and yours, here is my attempt at a systematic summary of what he says on the topic in that epistle. (For your information, the verses below cover most but not every single mention of death in Romans. I have mainly used the HCSB, which I am trialling.)
Sin causes death
Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, in this way death spread to all men, because all sinned. (Rom 5:12)
So
By the one man’s trespass the many died (Rom 5:15)
and
By the one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man (Rom 5:17)
Death reigned... even over those who did not sin in the likeness of Adam’s transgression (Rom 5:14, i.e. by breaking a specifically articulated command)
For the wages of sin is death. (Rom 6:23)
And people
Know full well God’s just sentence—that those who practice such things [i.e. “all manner of unrighteousness” etc., see Rom 1:29-31, ESV] deserve to die. (Rom 1:32)
So a personal observation and related question arises:
What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? (Rom 7:24)
The death of Christ brings us hope
For while we were still helpless, at the appointed moment, Christ died for the ungodly. For rarely will someone die for a just person—though for a good person perhaps someone might even dare to die. But God proves His own love for us in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us! (Rom 5:6-8)
And so
Much more then, since we have now been declared righteous by His blood, [i.e. his death viewed as a ‘sacrifice of atonement’ or a ‘propitiation’, see Rom 3:25] we will be saved through Him from wrath. For if, while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, then how much more, having been reconciled, will we be saved by His life! (Rom 5:9-10)
Because we know that Christ, having been raised from the dead, no longer dies. Death no longer rules over Him. (Rom 6:9)
So
Just as sin reigned in death, so also grace will reign through righteousness, resulting in eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. (Rom 5:21).
Being united with Christ in his death transforms our lives
All of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too may walk in a new way of life. For if we have been joined with Him in the likeness of His death, we will certainly also be in the likeness of His resurrection. (Rom 6:3-5)
So we
Died to sin (Rom 6:2)
Our old self was crucified with Him (Rom 6:6)
and
A person who has died is freed [literally ‘justified’ or ‘acquitted’] from sin (Rom 6:7, see HCSB footnote)
Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with Him (Rom 6:8)
You also were put to death in relation to the law through the [crucified] body of the Messiah, so that you may belong to another—to Him who was raised from the dead—that we may bear fruit for God (Rom 7:4)
Therefore, no condemnation now exists for those in Christ Jesus, because the Spirit’s law of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death. (Rom 8:1-2)
And so
If you live according to the flesh, you are going to die. But if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. (Rom 8:13)
Triumphant conclusion
Who can bring an accusation against God’s elect? God is the One who justifies. Who is the one who condemns? Christ Jesus is the One who died, but even more, has been raised; He also is at the right hand of God and intercedes for us. Who can separate us from the love of Christ? Can affliction or anguish or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword [i.e. death] (Rom 8:33-35)No, in all these things we are more than victorious through Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing will have the power to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord! (Rom 8:37-39)
And Commitment
None of us lives to himself, and no one dies to himself. If we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. Therefore, whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. Christ died and came to life for this: that He might rule over both the dead and the living. (Rom 14:7-9)



Sandy - like the idea, but wonder why the order of scripture is all out? Why not stick to Paul’s order in Romans? Romans 1 then 5-8? I think this has the benefit of putting Romans 7.24 in the right place - a man redeemed and looking forward to the final coming of the Kingdom - although you appear to favour the man of Romans 7 as unregenerate? I just think for me preaching it would be easier to progress through the book showing the unfolding logic, rather than jumping back and forth picking out texts… but I’m interested to see how you do it.
Also, I was wondering about your using the HCSB. I’ve heard it mentioned around the traps, but I was under the impression that most conservatives were moving to the ESV? What’s the benefit of using the HCSB? Will it split the conservative camp further if it starts going ESV or NASB or HCSB? Make conventions interesting… why not bring back the KJV?!
Howie, I agree, as I said, “far be it from me to improve on Paul’s arrangement of his material”!
Once I noticed how often Paul deals with the topic of death - both ours and Christ’s - in Romans, it was my meditative attempt to lay out his thoughts. I tried to be systematic, but I did not review it rigorously for all the possible implications my rearrangement was making (rightly or wrongly).
I guess I was rejoicing in the death of death in the death of Christ, to recycle John Owen’s old book title!
Howie, without going into the details, I think Romans 7 continues to apply to the regenerate, as I think Paul is speaking of his experience even after he became a Christian.
But for that reason, the desperate desire for rescue in 7:24 makes sense on the lips of someone becoming a Christian, as well as giving voice to continued thankfulness among us who have become Christians.
Howie, I am experimenting with other translations like HCSB, because of what’s happening with the NIV, as I blogged here.
I have commented further about the HCSB over on SydneyAnglicans on a topic on the same comment - scroll down further there for more comments on HCSB.
I plan to comment further on this as time goes by. I do regret that with the changes to the NIV that we appear to be losing a standard Bible in the evangelical world. But my concern is for those congregations who have judged the ESV as being a bit too hard for their level of readers.
Hi Sandy,
I always enjoy and benefit from reading your posts. For those not quite in the know, like me, what do the acronyms ESV, NASB, HCSB stand for? It would be helpful to know.
Hi Andy, sorry about that. These acronyms are the ones used to identify different English Bible translations.
I will identify them on a spectrum of most literal to sometimes dynamic equivalence (thought for thought, instead of word for word)...
* NASB - New American Standard Bible (best to get the 1995 update), woodenly literal;
* ESV - English Standard Version (an evangelical update of the RSV which you might have grown up on before the NIV was published)
* HCSB - Holman Christian Standard Bible
* NIV - New International Version, which now needs to be distinguished in three guises…
(i) NIV1984 - the version we all used for ages, but now (or soon) being discontinued;
(ii) TNIV - ‘Today’s NIV’ - very gender inclusive version which proved divisive for these reasons, and now being discontinued;
(iii) NIV2011 - the very recent update, 95% same as NIV, with some translational advances, and a milder but still very noticeable gender inclusivity.
All these Bibles are very suitable for study, and give much better access to the sense of the original languages than ones that use short sentences and limited vocab for poor readers, like the Good News or CEV (Contemporary English Version) or paraphrases like The Message or the New Living Translation, although these too have a place.
Speaking to you pastoring in Japan, I’d be interested to know how many versions of the Bible you have in Japanese, and as I ask that question, I remind myself how privileged we are in the English speaking world - spoilt for choice with Bible translations and Christian literature.
What a great insight into the book of Romans, perhaps one of my favorite and Luther’s too for that matter. This book seems to have helped to initiate the Great Reformation. Nicely done. My compliments.
Opps…my name should read Jack Wellman, with two “L’s”. Anyway, this was a good read.
Thanks Jack, with two Ls!
I appreciate you taking the time to encourage.
Sandy, I heard our elder once say and a pastor/evangelist say that Romans 7, for them, was one of the most difficult. I can understand why they might say that…for me, I and II Peter have much to negotiate and careful exegesis is critical.
Hey Sandy,
I like how you talk about death and life in the present tense through union. Do you think 8:11 should go there too?
Hi Andrew, and yes, why not?
When I was composing this, I think I just had to draw the line somewhere. But 8:11 points us to the Spirit’s resurrecting work to come in us, although his work has already begun.
Hi Sandy,
<Speaking to you pastoring in Japan, I’d be interested to know how many versions of the Bible you have in Japanese>
In recent years there have been more translations available - which is a really good thing.
i. The ‘original’ ‘KJV-type’ translation is rarely used nowadays. It was, apparently, extremely difficult to read and understand and was said by some to be the greatest stumbling block to the spread of Christianity in Japan.
ii. We now have an equivalent of the ‘Living Bible’ translation which (like the English) is easy to read but perhaps not best for scholarly purposes.
iii. The ‘NIV’ translation (Japanese “Shinkaiyaku”) seems to be the best one available at the moment and is becoming widely used. (It’s also available in bilingual versions (with the NIV) which is great for international churches like ours.)
iv. There is also the
a. “Kougoyaku” - an everyday language translation
b. “Gendaigoyaku” - another everyday language translation, and
c. “Kyoudouyaku” - which I’m told by a pastor friend here is “an ecumenical translation of the Catholic and Protestant church(es) and are a very positive effort, yet some of those translations might water down the original power of the Hebrew/ Greek text.”
I myself am not familiar with these last three versions.
You are right in saying how blessed we are to have so many versions available to us in English. Thanks for your help with the acronyms re my earlier mail.
Blessings.
Fair ‘nuff Sandy
My hunch with 8:11 is that Paul mean’s the Spirit’s work in us this side of the resurrection because he says “through his Spirit that dwells in you”. That seems a bit of a weird thing to say if he is talking about a corpse – surely the Spirit won’t be dwelling in us when we are in the grave? Though I guess he could be just clarifying that it is the Spirit who currently lives in us who will one day raise us.
Commenting rules
If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:
Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.
If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.
Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.