Countering nowism Lionel Windsor

Lionel Windsor

It's been interesting to follow the comments on Tony's post about the ethics of everyday evangelism. Tony makes a helpful point: rather than getting caught up with the question of whether we must evangelize, it's far more useful to ask how we can encourage, inspire and equip more Christians to talk about Jesus with their friends.

In this post, I'd like to offer one suggestion, based on my previous post about the insidious heresy of nowism that's creeping in and killing our Christian lives. I reckon that if we can keep fighting nowism, this will really help our evangelistic endeavours.

Sometimes in the debate about evangelism, 1 Peter 3:15 is quoted to show that all Christians should at least be ready to answer for their Christian faith if asked. 1 Peter 3:14-16 reads:

But even if you should suffer for righteousness' sake, you will be blessed. Have no fear of them, nor be troubled, but in your hearts honour Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect, having a good conscience, so that, when you are slandered, those who revile your good behaviour in Christ may be put to shame.

But let me ask you: how often are you actually asked for a reason for the hope that is in you? How many times this week did anyone come up to you and start demanding reasons for your hope? If you're anything like me, it doesn't happen that often. But Peter seems to be expecting that it will happen—at least regularly enough that it's worth giving instructions about what to do when it does happen! Why is that? Because Peter knows that our hope of salvation—of the glorious inheritance kept for us in heaven—is the basis for our entire Christian lives (1 Peter 1:3ff), and he expects that that hope will make real, obvious and demonstrable differences in the way we live. Christians should be equipped, encouraged and inspired by our hope to live and act very differently to the people around us. For example, we will rejoice in inevitable sufferings (1:6), prepare our minds for sober-minded action (1:13), live as if we're exiles and aliens in the world (1:17), and treat the world's ways as futile (1:18). In the immediate context of 1 Peter 3:15, we will suffer for the sake of righteousness, without fearing the world. As a result, Peter expects that unbelievers will see our weird, outlandish behaviour and demand answers from us!

So how often has that happened for you? If it doesn't happen often, why not? Is it because so many of us are are really nowists? We come to church or Bible study each week, and we rejoice that we have our doctrine of the future sorted out. Having passed ‘living hope 101’, we then spend our lives conforming to what everybody else is doing: following that career or course, working those long hours, building that big house, creating a future for our children in this world. Our friends and colleagues know we're ‘Christians’, but from our behaviour, they think that means we're a sort of polite, morally upright version of the world. In the minds of unbelievers, we're quite nice people who are running after the same goals they are, with the same sorts of lives and dreams, the same concerns and cares, but with a bit of extra ‘Christian’ stuff added in (e.g. we might choose a Christian school instead of a public school for our kids, or we might decide to go to church instead of soccer on Sundays).

Of course, there's nothing inherently wrong with the things of this world—with food and drink and houses and cars and families and schools. And there's nothing inherently more holy about suffering or poverty in itself. But, at the same time, if our whole lives are made up of a series of decisions that look similar to the decisions unbelievers make (even though there is nothing wrong with any of those decisions individually), questions must be asked: is our nowism stifling not only our Christian lives, but our evangelism to boot?

Rather than worrying about whether we're supposed to evangelize, I reckon we should put our efforts into changing our attitudes and lives so that evangelism will be simply unavoidable.

Therefore, preparing your minds for action, and being sober-minded, set your hope fully on the grace that will be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ. (1 Peter 1:13)

2 Comments »

Philip Griffin11/08/2008 01:32 PM

Thanks Lionel for raising this subject.

I’d like to add what I think is another element in the effects of Nowism on us. 

There is a much greater pressure on preachers in our time to accentuate only the positive in what they preach.  Whilst holiness preaching of the type you mention is now very rare, preaching on ‘values’ is very common and growing in popularity.  Values to help my family, to help me make ethically sound choices at work and at the supermarket, etc.  Preaching on values is seen as positive preaching.

However, refuting error is increasinly being criticised as divisive and unnecessary. Nowism means we lose sight both of the wonder of our future inheritance and of the horror of the final judgment on those who do not turn to the Lord Jesus in faith and repentance.  As a consequence, Nowism places less emphasis on warning against false teachers and more emphasis on good Christian values. 

In my view, this is a very serious problem we face within many churches right now.  This trend is very deeply disturbing.  We need to pray that our Father in heaven may deliver us from the insidious effects of Nowism and keep us steadfast in teaching both what is true and against what is false and misleading.

I agree Lionel, Christian distinctiveness is required, not just the polite, charitable sort, but also the loss-enduring, distinguishable value system, etc, so people will be able to see the hope that we have, which is beyond their understanding unless we explain to them.

Good post!

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
By God’s Word Volumes 1 and 2

Sponsors

Briefing cover

The Sola Panel

The Briefing

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Karen Beilharz on A Vine confabulation

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Current discussions

RSS logo

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 (11 comments)

God, the universe and all that: Part 1 (7 comments)

John Wimber changes his mind (6 comments)

A Vine confabulation (3 comments)

Stark treatment of the Crusades (2 comments)

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

God, the universe and all that: Part 4 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In the fourth instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor uncovers the answer to the riddle. (Read … more

A Vine confabulation by Ian Carmichael (3 comments). We at Matthias Media have recently made available a free and downloadable discussion guide for Col Marshall and Tony Payne's … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 by Lionel Windsor (11 comments). In the third instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor discovers we humans are significant in the … more

Kids@church/Click: Some great material for your children’s Sunday School by Jean Williams (0 comments). I teach Sunday School for children regularly, but I don't always have the time and energy to write my … more

Experiencing confusion by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). I mentioned in my last Saturday post that for the next little while, we would be looking at … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 2 by Lionel Windsor (1 comment). In the second instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor contemplates the extent of our significance in … more

Stark treatment of the Crusades by Peter Bolt (2 comments). Revisionist history is probably as common as it is unethical. There are lessons to learn from the past, but … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 1 by Lionel Windsor (7 comments). In the first instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor ponders what astronomy has to teach us. … more

John Wimber changes his mind by Karen Beilharz (6 comments). As our beloved convenor Paul Grimmond has now left us, I shall be taking over the … more

The Winter Olympics, basketball, Paul and teamwork by Peter Sholl (3 comments). There are very few Mexicans competing in the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics. Well, that is what I assume from … more

Ministry partners