What if individualism isn’t really the problem? Tony Payne

David Juniper23/07/2008 11:46 AM

Individualism and its most powerful contemporary ally, consumersim, are not the disease but they are a symptom and a constant temptation.  We do our people well to point out their false promises of fulfilment and significance.

David,

Yes indeed. One of the more challenging aspects of Jonathan’s approach was to argue that the real solution to individualism was not simply an individualistic repentance, but repentance into a church—into the obedience and relationship and discipline that goes with committing yourself to a congregation.

This of course is one of the tunes that the 9Marks guys play often, but they do so for a good reason. In their context, and increasingly in ours here in Aus, church is seen as an optional extra for the Christian; something you consume and make use of (like any other useful service industry), but which is not essential, and might possibly be replaced or rendered redundant by other service providers who fill the same needs!

They aren’t ‘communitarians’ (in the sense that Jonathan critiques) but perhaps I could cheekily call them ‘high churchman’ (in the good sense of what phrase once meant in Anglicanism—having a very high view of the church and its role).

TP

Stephen Jackson24/07/2008 03:55 PM

No, this doesn’t resonate with me at all.

I reflect on the character of Jesus’ ministry (and Paul to a large extent also) being entirely relational and focussed in community living.  His constant meal sharing, telling of stories to friends and groups, healing ministry, gathering of disciples, wisdom teaching and so on speaks strongly to me of the primacy of our relationships being an agent of ‘the kingdom of God’.  On balance in the synoptics, I think there is far less material on personal santification issues than how the ‘kingdom of God’ is realised through our relational context.

Much of the authentic Pauline writings are less doctrinal creeds about personal sanctification, but more encouragement and exhortation about how to live in Christian community.  Take the Corinthians as an example - he passionately exhorts them to overcome their differences…. chapter after chapter. 

I’m not convinced the historical Jesus or Paul would support your conclusions about individual first, community second.  I suspect that for them, certainly in the context of 1stC Palestine, the dualistic separation of individual from community is meaningless.  This separation is a later western cultural development that was concurrently reflected in personalised/individualised theology and articles of faith.

Cheers.

Hi Stephen

Did you read Jonathan’s article? He’s not saying ‘individual first, community second’, and I hope that my brief extracts didn’t convey that impression.

He affirms that our lack of community and relationship is a problem (and its many unhelpful side-effects and byproducts). But he argues (and I think rightly) that the nasty secret of Enlightenment-driven, modernist individualism is sin—the declaration of individual autonomy from God. This is the root cause of our problems, and our modern lack of community, relationship and love is the consequence.

So he’s saying that the solution is not to address the symptom but the disease. And the repentance he’s talking about is not atomised and individualistic; it’s deeply tied up with church.

One of the reasons I like the article, in fact, was that he manages to keep the ‘individual’ and the ‘communal’ tied closely together, giving each their proper and due place (because as you say, you can’t really separate them in the end). His critique of the ‘communitarians’ is that by focusing too much on the symptom, and not thinking it through with sufficient theological rigour, they end up unhelpfully re-casting key biblical doctrines (like sin, Christ and salvation). 

Hope that helps and clarifies.

TP

Stephen Jackson26/07/2008 03:33 PM

Hi Tony,

Yes, there is common ground on what we are both saying: that the atomisation of western secular society is occurring and is rooted in the cult of the individual, which springs forth from our broken humanity.  We might use different language, but I think we agree on this.

A significant difference remains however, and perhaps I was a somewhat opaque in my previous post…apologies (I tend to write short, generalised posts rather than long detailed ones you have probably noticed)  Setting ourselves right with God is enacted through our community living where the ‘Kingdom of God’ can break through and transform peoples lives. Individualism has no power to do this. I believe this is the model that Jesus sets before us.  Re-reading the Last Supper story with this lense is most instructive.

Mediated salvation through the Church is something entirely different.

Reading 1Cor15 recently has also clarified this in my mind about Paul’s position on how ‘salvation’ is enacted, ie through community.

Cheers.

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Islam in our backyard: A novel argument

Sponsors

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Stephen Jackson on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Sam Freney on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Marty Foord on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Dianne Howard on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Mike Bull on Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia

Current discussions

RSS logo

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel! by Tony Payne (4 comments). Regular Sola Panel readers will no doubt have detected a little slowness and quietness over the past six weeks or so. … more

Kids’ culture watch spot: Facing fear by Gordon Cheng (3 comments). By popular demand (two people asked), here is my next script for a culture watch spot I did with the kids … more

Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia by Gordon Cheng (1 comment). It's a Sunday as I write this, and I'm speaking on Daniel 2 and 7 later this morning at a friend's … more

A constituent on same-sex marriage by Sandy Grant (34 comments). Last year, the Australian Parliament agreed that its Members of Parliament (MPs) should seek the … more

A tribute to John Stott by Sandy Grant (2 comments). Friends, I'm not ashamed to say I shed a tear when I opened up my computer on Thursday morning to read … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 3): On giants’ shoulders by Scott Newling (26 comments). This is the third post in this series; you can read part one, and more

Bible reading with kids by Sandy Grant (0 comments). I was asked for recommendations for resources that would encourage parents to read the Bible with their kids, especially … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 2): Stepping aside (not out) so others can step up (not in) by Scott Newling (3 comments). This is the second post in this series; you can read the first post, Unassuming … more

One more sip of the coffee by Tony Payne (8 comments). Sandy Grant is a man of integrity. Back in the early days of Sola Panel, I wrote a post … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 1): Unassuming generations by Scott Newling (30 comments). There is a model of ‘intergenerational theological decline’ that has been doing the rounds of late, and perhaps you … more

Tony Payne

Tony Payne

Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.

Sola Panellists



Some other sites
we like  (Why these?)

Ministry partners