is sponsored and hosted by
Current issue
Recent comments
Mikey Lynch on Excuse me, but what's ‘mission’? (04/12/2008).
Nigel Statham on The second commandment (03/12/2008).
Dave Woolcott on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).
sandy Grant on The second commandment (03/12/2008).
Sandy Grant on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).
Ben Hudson on Job and prayer (03/12/2008).
Dave Woolcott on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).
Sandy Grant on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).
Brad Hansen on Getting rid of the killer but (03/12/2008).
Paul Grimmond on Getting rid of the killer but (03/12/2008).
Recent posts
Excuse me, but what’s ‘mission’? by Peter Sholl (1 comment). As a new missionary visiting a church recently, this was a question asked by one keen enquirer. He explained that he … more
The second commandment by Lionel Windsor (2 comments). Church as we know it can sometimes be a bit weird and jarring. A few weeks ago at church, we heard … more
Getting rid of the killer but by Paul Grimmond (8 comments). I admit it, the title is a serious temptation: I feel an overwhelming desire to make bad jokes about posteriors (perhaps … more
What are we doing anyway? by Tony Payne (11 comments). One of the pitfalls most non-profit organizations fall into at one stage or another is endless discussion about vision and mission … more
Factotum #2 by Paul Grimmond (2 comments). Here is the next one in our line of Saturday blasts from the past. If you're new to us, let me … more
You must read this book by Gordon Cheng (0 comments). I am struggling to find reasons to avoid reading a few things, including a small pile next to the bed, and … more
Evaluating truth by Paul Grimmond (17 comments). I spent two days last week at a writing conference. It was a great couple of days, and I learned … more
Christian ministry and normal Christians by Tony Payne (19 comments). I count it one of the privileges of my life to have grown up in a time and a place when … more
An interview with Jean Williams by Sandy Grant (7 comments). Today we interview Jean Williams. Jean, how did you come to Christ? It's not an exciting story, but in … more
Guilt-edged pages? by Nicole Starling (5 comments). While ploughing my way through The Shack1 recently (and it was a matter of ploughing my … more
Paul Grimmond
Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.
Sola Panellists
- Paul Grimmond (convenor)
- Andrew Barry
- Peter Bolt
- Gordon Cheng
- Sandy Grant
- Ben Pfahlert
- Gavin Perkins
- Tony Payne
- Archie Poulos
- Nicole Starling
- Mark Thompson
- Jean Williams
- Lionel Windsor
Some other sites
we like (Why these?)
- Matthias Media
- The Briefing
- 9Marks
- Albert Mohler
- Anglican Church League
- Between Two Worlds
- challies
- David Ould
- EQUIP book club
- From the Dean
- Girl Talk
- Gordon Cheng's Blog
- Jean Williams's blog
- Lionel Windsor
- Monergism
- Moore College
- MTS
- Nicole Starling's blog
- Pyromaniacs
- The Gospel Coalition
- The Proclamation Trust
- The Simeon Trust
- The Ugley Vicar
Tony,
Fulcrum, the “open” evangelical group has critiqued the Gafcon response to the proposed Anglican covenant, saying that the Gafcon team used the wrong document. While I don’t think this affects the main thrust of Gafcon’s rejection of the covenant, does Fulcrum have a point? It would be good for Gafcon to be seen to respond to Fulcrum, I think because it is a group that as you have pointed out elsewhere, will be faced with a choice sooner or later.
http://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/page.cfm?ID=330
Tony,
What do you mean by “classically Evangelical”? How would you describe the current Bishop of Tasmania?
John,
I think that the comparison of the St Andrews Draft of the covenant was in fact done with another document and not the Nassau Draft. This was an unfortunate error. The St Andrews Draft is not in fact as significantly different from the Nassau Draft as this comparison document suggests.
However, the critique of the St Andrews Draft of the Anglican Covenant stands on its own. I understand it was written independently and prior to the comparison document. On that score I think Andrew Goddard’s attempts at defending the St Andrews Draft are unconvincing.
Hi Marty
I did say that someone would correct me immediately!
What I meant by ‘classically evangelical’ was someone who builds their life and ministry on those elements of evangelical theology that have always characterized it (the five solas of the Reformation are not a bad summary). Another way of saying it is that if a ‘classic evangelical’ were transported back in time by a century, he would still be readily recognized as an evangelical by his forebears.
TP
I was more interested in clarification rather than correction, so thanks!
Thank you Mark for that frank response. I think it is helpful for Gafcon to be open about these things and not to resort to PR.
Hi Tony
Thanks for your thought on GAFCON. While reading the material on the GAFCON website during the conference I couldn’t help notice the charismatic flavour of many of the comments, particularly those of the African Bishops. Do you have any thoughts on how you see this impacting the wider Anglican community in the future?
Commenting rules
If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:
Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.
If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.
Your Comment