Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation
Karen Beilharz on A Vine confabulation
Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation
Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3
Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3
God, the universe and all that: Part 3 (11 comments)
A Vine confabulation (3 comments)
Stark treatment of the Crusades (2 comments)
God, the universe and all that: Part 2 (1 comment)
God, the universe and all that: Part 5 (0 comments)
God, the universe and all that: Part 5 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In this fifth and final instalment of his five-part series, Lionel Windsor reveals what the solution to … more
Experiencing God by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). If you've just joined us, in these Saturday posts we've been looking at classics from The Briefing archive … more
God, the universe and all that: Part 4 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In the fourth instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor uncovers the answer to the riddle. (Read … more
A Vine confabulation by Ian Carmichael (3 comments). We at Matthias Media have recently made available a free and downloadable discussion guide for Col Marshall and Tony Payne's … more
God, the universe and all that: Part 3 by Lionel Windsor (11 comments). In the third instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor discovers we humans are significant in the … more
Kids@church/Click: Some great material for your children’s Sunday School by Jean Williams (0 comments). I teach Sunday School for children regularly, but I don't always have the time and energy to write my … more
Experiencing confusion by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). I mentioned in my last Saturday post that for the next little while, we would be looking at … more
God, the universe and all that: Part 2 by Lionel Windsor (1 comment). In the second instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor contemplates the extent of our significance in … more
Stark treatment of the Crusades by Peter Bolt (2 comments). Revisionist history is probably as common as it is unethical. There are lessons to learn from the past, but … more
God, the universe and all that: Part 1 by Lionel Windsor (7 comments). In the first instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor ponders what astronomy has to teach us. … more
Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.
Thanks Lionel. I am about to go to a meeting with Leichardt Council and some people opposed to what we are doing as a church. And it’s very clear how I should apply the principles you have spoken about in this meeting. Yours, Dominic
“Secondly, a godly comment is one which is clothed in prayer for the other person.”
Crikey, do we really have to clothe every comment in prayer? I thought blogging was already time-consuming enough as is…
Ben, OTOH, <i>life</i> is time consuming.
Well, at least, <i>my</i> life seems to be just at the moment. :-(
‘A comment that fails to understand what I’ve said, but instead just ends up talking about something else that exists in the mind of the commenter, is unloving.’
‘And feel free, of course, to disagree with me, or to pick holes in my argument—provided you’ve heard what I’ve said’.
Lionel.
I have really tried to appreciate what you have said. And yes I feel nervous responding with a comment!! I suggest that you may have failed to take into account the limitations that some of us may have.
There can be all sorts of reasons a person may not understand such as having a different intellectual ability to the writer, reading difficulties, inability to hold together a range of ideas. They may, such as myself, think they have understood sufficiently when they might not have and so respond inappropriately’ (unlovingly?) in relation to the comment.
In our churches this can also be an issue that can be overlooked but leads to people being unwittingly silenced because of their limitations.
I suggest love (patience) will be needed from both sides because of the nature of communication between fallible and cognitively limited people.
Di
Hi Lionel,
Great Blog mate.
In my job I receive a bit of . . . well let’s call it . . . “constructive criticism”. If people followed your advice I reckon I’d spend far more time talking with disgruntled people ABOUT THE ACTUAL ISSUES rather than about HOW the issues were raised. Love covers a multitude of sins. Your wisdom is much appreciated.
benny
STOP SHOUTING, BEN. GODLY PEOPLE DON’T SHOUT.
Oh—you were discussing substance, not style? I missed what you said, sorry.
Hi Lionel,
On the odd occasion when (probably unwisely) I’ve been given the chance to preach at church, one of the things that’s struck me is the difference between what I thought was the main point of my talk, and what other people thought I was saying. Now this could merely be a symptom of how bad my talk was, but I’m certain that others have encountered it.
Post-modernists make a big thing about how the reader’s interpretation is as valid as the writer’s. How do we overcome this to ensure that when people “listen” to us, what they hear is what we’re actually saying.
Commenting rules
If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:
Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.
If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.
Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.