Is it possible for Western liberal journalists to even think ethically any more? Peter Bolt

Journalists, especially opinion writers, crystallise public thought. If their responsibility is to reflect the culture they live in - ie. one of relativism, pragmatism and rampant individualism - then they are very “responsible” to their calling.

But if we choose to define the responsiblity of the media as one of a higher calling - ie. to infuse debates with principles and morality, no matter how anachronistic they seem today - then they often, though not always, failed to act responsibly.

I don’t think they set out to do this in the first place. A media lecture I went to in my uni days was entitled, “Why moral posturing is ruining public debate”. I think that says it all. In short, we need more christians in the media.

-Sophia (a journalist)

I’m not certain that the 2 examples cited were intended to reflect current culture as much as they were ‘posturing’ to represent political correctness.

I definitely agree with Sophie - we need more Christian Journalists who will express a Christian-Worldview based opinion. I realise that’s hard though because it WILL come at a price (usually loss of job, image etc).

But there’s a role for the “Gordon Cheng - type Christians” too. i.e. those that write letters to the editor etc.

I wonder though, sometimes at the personal cost to non-Christian and Christian journalists/writers/etc of the dualism (nice word for hyprocrisy - sorry) they have to maintain. When you speak with some of them “off the record” the views they espouse so passionately from behind the microphone or word processor often contradict what they truly think/feel about the matter. Reflecting the culture you’re communicating to is one thing, but omitting to provide honest analysis compromises their ethics and integrity.
(ok I’ll get off my soap box now or else my comment will end up longer than Peter’s article.)

John Sandeman07/05/2008 12:35 AM

Is it possible for theological commentators to write clearly anymore?
If a journalist wrote about the views of christian commentators in the same way that Peter Bolt writes about journalists, there would be pulpit rumblings.
Peter cites someone “on the airways”. We don’t even know if they are a journalist. Its like reporting the views of a “prominent preaching identity”. We don’t know if it is Brian Houston or Phillip Jensen. Both might be offended.
Peter cites a female commentator - from the dailies. Still don’t know if she is a journalist , or the context. Perhaps a comment piece on an oped page?Journalists or not, commentators in the papers, contra Bolt, expect contradiction, whether in the letters page or the column of a rival. They are part of a flow of comment, and objections principled or not are bound to be raised.
Unlike preachers, they can expect public feedback.
Judging by strength of argument this part of the sola panel appears to be operating at low power.

A NOTE FROM (ONE OF) YOUR FRIENDLY MODERATORS

Thank you everybody for your comments so far!

Just a friendly reminder to everybody that we would like you to use your full name when you post comments (that is, first name and last name).

We’re pretty relaxed about this at the moment, and we are even letting spammers sell their wares on site until I notice and delete ; -) , but as we get through our early teething problems we would like people to follow these guidelines.

We are still tossing up things like comment moderation (which would help defeat the evil spammers), and will keep you in touch with where we head on such questions. If you have feedback that you want to give us at any time then one of the best ways is to e-mail us on briefingATmatthiasmedia.com.au, replacing the ‘AT’ with an @.

[update: currently comment moderation is turned on]

Those are some excellent insights, John. If Christians wish to improve the standard of journalism, they would do well to set an example first. I’ve seen enough Christian journalism to demonstrate to me that it is not merely the secular media that are to blame.

It’s worth pointing out that considerable debate exists about the role that journalists play in the reporting of the news. Should they be impartial observers, or is it actually beneficial for the journalist to write from his or her own perspective. Is such a thing as neutrality even possible? Personally, I’d suggest not, which is why independent media and differing perspectives from within the same publication is necessary.

Robert ian Williams08/05/2008 03:34 PM

Sadly most of the media are trapped by their own self-deception of political correctness. Like the Emperor’s
New clothes, they are afraid of departing from the “ correct"line.

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your full name (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments

The Future of Jesus
Briefing cover

The Sola Panel

The Briefing

Current issue

The strategy of God

Recent comments

RSS logo

Scott Tubman on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (20/08/2008).

Ian Carmichael on Sola Gratia - Tahlia's story (20/08/2008).

Cathy McKay on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (20/08/2008).

Gordon Cheng on An interview with Mark Thompson (20/08/2008).

Martin Kemp on The indivisibility of truth (20/08/2008).

Andrew Barry on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (20/08/2008).

Scott Tubman on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (19/08/2008).

Scott Tubman on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (19/08/2008).

Alex Phillips on A freebie for you: Jonah in the ESV (19/08/2008).

Nicole Starling on "We are poorly dressed" - Part 2 (19/08/2008).

Recent posts

RSS logo

An interview with Mark Thompson by Sandy Grant (1 comment). Today we interview Mark Thompson... Mark, how did you come to Christ? I first heard the gospel … more

Sola Gratia - Tahlia’s story by Lionel Windsor (4 comments). Tahlia was born addicted to heroin, thanks to her mum Shae’s addiction. Tahlia (not her real name) lives with … more

“We are poorly dressed” - Part 2 by Nicole Starling (9 comments). Thanks to everyone who contributed comments in answer to the question that I raised in my previous … more

The indivisibility of truth by Tony Payne (4 comments). This Saturday’s classic Briefing extract is about the indivisibility of truth. It’s from Briefing #8, August 1, 1988: If … more

Dread, joy and Morning Prayer by Tony Payne (5 comments). Standing on the 5th tee at St Michael’s, in Sydney’s East, the golfer experiences a mixture of nervousness and dread. Here … more

A freebie for you: Jonah in the ESV by Gordon Cheng (10 comments). Here at Matthias Media, we read and recommend the English Standard Version Bible, the ESV, as a superior … more

‘We are poorly dressed…’ - Part 1 by Nicole Starling (15 comments). “We are poorly dressed… Be imitators of me.” (1 Cor 4:11, 16) “All her household are clothed in … more

Where’s your ministry ‘AT’? by Ben Pfahlert (11 comments). Christians and soldiers have a lot in common, or at least they should (2 Tim 2:3-4). Firstly they both know that … more

Countering Nowism by Lionel Windsor (2 comments). It’s been interesting to follow the comments on Tony’s post about the … more

The evangelical inferiority complex by Tony Payne (3 comments). It’s Saturday. Must be time for another classic snippet from the early days of The Briefing, this time about evangelicalism’s … more