Hugh Bryant-Parsons on 'Missional Lifestyle': Education
Jean Williams on Top 10 Tips for Sleep Deprived Prayer
Taking ‘crazy’ one step closer to ‘can do’ (2 comments)
The God of the nobody (0 comments)
The God of the nobody by Jean Williams (0 comments). This is the sixth post in Jean's series on women in the Bible. (Read the first, second, more
Can you feel it? by Rachel Macdonald (0 comments). In the September issue of The Briefing, Tony Payne writes about the role of emotions in being a … more
10 in 2 by Ben Pfahlert (6 comments). In January 2010 I set myself a goal that has transformed my diary, my thinking, my reading and the … more
Taking ‘crazy’ one step closer to ‘can do’ by Guest blogger (2 comments). Guest blogger Mikey Lynch, one of the directors of The Geneva Push, talks about the network's approach to … more
Top 10 Tips for Sleep Deprived Prayer by Jennie Baddeley (5 comments). There are so many reasons for losing sleep it's not really worth listing them. You're either getting enough sleep or you're … more
Stress-throwers and stress-absorbers by Jean Williams (0 comments). Are you a stress-thrower or a stress-absorber? A stress-thrower blames things on others and expresses stress in anger; a … more
‘Missional Lifestyle’: Education by Nicole Starling (12 comments). This is the fifth in Nicole's series on ‘missional lifestyle’. Read parts 1, 2, 3 … more
Why do we pray for others? by Scott Newling (1 comment). Learning to pray for others is one of the first things we learn as Christians: we see it commended … more
Forgiveness and repentance (part 8): Does God only forgive us when we repent? (ii) by Mark Baddeley (17 comments). (Read parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.) Does … more
The power of example by Peter Sholl (3 comments). Mexico in the 1940s was a country trying to come to grips with the 20th century. While discoveries of oil and … more
Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.
Our destiny is worm food? I thought we believed in bodily resurrection?
Andrew,
Don’t know if you saw it, but what did you think about Lionel’s comments on addressing environmental problems in his post (scroll down) on welcoming children?
Maybe I am off your topic a bit, but it’s so very heard to know exactly what to believe about global warming and so on, whereas it seems very clear to me that humans ought not to be be greedy and profligate in their use of resources. And the coming judgment ought to be an incentive to repent of such waste!
One particularly good response to the environment was put out by the Social Issues Executive of the Sydney Anglican Church. But the destruction /end-of-the current created order is not mentioned. I was a bit disappointed. I don’t think it would hurt their case at all to include it.
http://sie.moore.edu.au/fileadmin/user_upload/faculty/ajc/SIE_Environment—A_Christian_Response.pdf
Hi Michael. I may not have been clear - but this is the destiny for our bodies until Christ returns (see the opening sentence of the paragraph). The point still stands. Doctors try and fix up the body even though it will be destroyed physically by worms.
Hi Sandy. This is an excellent post by Lionel and the comments you make are right. I have five kids of my own and yet it’s still hard to teach ourselves and our children to be less greedy - particularly at this time of the year. A couple of days ago we came back from our holiday. We had a great time staying in a holiday house with hardly any ‘stuff’, but were shocked when we came back to our house and all our junk that burdens us down.
Andrew,
my point with bodily resurrection is that we can’t read ‘total destruction’ in an absolute sense. There is a transformation of this created order and so a real continuity between our bodies now and our resurrection bodies. So with bodies the significance is not just ‘its good to keep the body alive even though it will die’ but ‘because we have been created and will be renewed bodily our bodies matter now’. If this is right, can you also say it for the environment?
Thanks Andrew, especially for tackling the issue from the perspective of scripture.
Personally I found the report you mentioned to be quite depressing.
I have concluded to this point in time (and hope to be proved wrong) that there is no mention of the ‘destruction/end of the created order’ because this is not believed, at least not in the terms as you express it or as I understand it from scripture. Rather the emphasis from the article (and some discussions in other places) seems to be on ‘renewing’ and ‘rejuvenating’ rather than on ‘new’ as in Rev 21-22.
Am I missing something here? Please correct me if I am wrong in my thoughts.
Di
Michael. I think the comparison is very tight.
The good the doctors do to our physical bodies will not last. It takes God to breathe life into the dry bones and give them life again.
The same is true of the environment. It will take God to destroy and give new life into the creation.
The renewal of the world (following it’s destruction) is ultimately only going to happen by God’s hand. This doesn’t mean we don’t act. We still care for the world until God cleans it up himself.
Hi Di. I am totally with you on this. I am also saddened by the way that the Christian academy has let us down in this issue.
I have noticed a parallel polarisation between those who focus on evangelism and those who emphasise social justice issues. Often the underlying theological divide is in our eschatology and whether we emphasise the destruction or transformation of the world. (Or in some cases ignore eschatology all together.)
This is a very apt critique but then again we cling to things and fight for things that perish. Our jobs one day will end and the homes that we live in we’ll one day move out of and the countries that we live in will one day be judged and be no more. But it doesn’t stop us from fighting for them…
The environmental debate has been hijacked by a lot of crazies, especially those from the socialist left. They’ve taken the environment to worship creation rather than the creator so Christians need to be careful not to singe their fingers in the same way.
Regarding Lionel’s comment:
The Sydney Diocese’ requirements for clergy housing are not exactly stingy. Do our housing committees consider environmental factors when setting housing standards?
Hi Andrew,
I think you are right that the images of judgement and violent intervention are often played down by some who seek to embrace an eschatology of material continuity.
Perhaps as a way of helping you understand where such folks are coming from, it is helpful to remember that the Christian theological tradition has, in many cases, downplayed any notion of material continuity, and eagerly embraced the wholesale annihilation of the world. “Heaven” becomes the favoured term for the future, rather than “new creation”. This has inspired the reaction you now see, in which many folk (myself included), have been surprised and delighted to discover that the Bible speaks also of the renewal of the created order, and a ‘full bodied’ future in resurrection life. Inevitably, in reacting to the previous extreme, new extremes develop, and this has led to a downplaying of important texts. It can be hard to get the balance right.
Having said that, I am not sure we are on the same page on this issue, but I do appreciate your drawing attention to the need for balance. I simply think it important, however, to remember that the historical-theological context for this issue is broader than the last 5 years of scholarship. That larger horizon is what informs a lot of the thinking you see.
Hi Phil. Thanks for your comment. I think you point out a real parallel here. It’s brilliant that Christians get involved in good works as long as they still proclaim boldly the judgment of God and his salvation. Destruction before renewal seems so vital since God will make a clean start again and there will be no more injustice, poverty, crying etc.. when he (not us) makes all things new. This again doesn’t mean we avoid good works - quite the contrary.
Hi Hadyn. I’m glad you’re reading along. As is often the case, I think what you have to say makes a lot of sense. Christians can buy into a lot more than environmental care when they dip into environmentalism. We must beware worshiping it, being cruel to it, or letting it change the gospel.
Hi Roger. I think I’ll have to let Lionel continue this discussion - but I’ll say this on a personal note: I think that big families should abandon the idea that every child has his/her own room. This applies as much to those in ministry as others. We have three in one room and two in the other. At a previous church we had four in a room.
Hi Mark. Thank you for writing your comments. I think you have given a good account as to why many have swung to a new position here. Why can’t people hold both! I worry though that the swing away from destruction language is actually a weak attempt to make the gospel seem more palatable. In the end true comfort comes from the knowledge that God will fix up the mess that we couldn’t. After all 2 Peter 3 speaks about those who are Christ’s people living on both sides of the cataclysmic event (continuity). It also says that God will destroy the present creation (discontinuity) as he did in the time of the flood. He himself is going to make the environment new, just and beautiful. This doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t be live new, just and ‘beautiful’ lives while we wait. In fact, quite the opposite.
This discussion reminds me of a seminar that I ran around two years ago at Christians in the Media on ‘Ethics and Climate Change’. It was just a small group and so is not very polished at all. Check it out if you are interested.
http://www.christiansinthemedia.org/downloads/070913_ABarry_climate_change.mp3
Commenting rules
If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:
Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.
If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.
Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.