Do you believe in the power of prayer? Lionel Windsor

Well, it kind of defeats the purpose of praying for healing for the sick though, doesn’t it.

We really should have a ban on all those types of prayers (for those with cancer to those who’ve stubbed their big toe) because (a) they don’t work, (b) they give false hope, and (c) they distract from the true nature of prayer and/or our mortality.

Andrew Gleeson30/04/2008 03:41 PM

Lionel wonders why the prayer experiments ‘failed. But did they? From a worldly point of view, they probably did. But from a Godly perspective? Surely the ‘success’  of prayer (if that is the right word) is not to be measured by worldly effects (which is not to say we cannot rejoice in a healing as God’s work). That is the whole point of saying that we should trust not in the ‘power of prayer’ but in the power of God.

Dennis Eric Ohsan02/05/2008 01:32 PM

We had a conference a few years ago and the theme was “The Power of Prayer.” The speaker kept on giving examples about “believers in Korea (or some other country) praying five, six hours a day.” If his reports are to be believed, some Christians in Korea prayed upwards of twenty hours a day, while shut up in a cave. The examples he gave may have truth in them, but the impression that was left was prayer in itself is powerful. The fact that it is God who is sovereignly hearing and answering prayer was somehow lost or overshadowed. Now we have people who think that “longer prayers are holier prayers.”

Andrew Gleeson suggests that the success of prayer is not to be measured by its worldly effects.  This sounds awfully like Schleiermacher, for whom religion was entirely subjective.  Is the only important efficacity of prayer in relation to the believer?

Lionel, you have suggested that put to the test by your children, you too might withhold your fatherly ‘blessing’.  Tell me though: if an outsider sought to size up your goodness as a dad by observing your responsiveness to your children, what ought they to expect to see?  Given that the whole world sees Christians at prayer…

By the way, the abstract of Randolph Byrd’s article, published in Southern Medical Journal 1988 Jul; 81(7): 826-9, concluded: ‘The IP [intercessory prayer] group subsequently had a significantly lower severity score based on the hospital course after entry (P less than .01). Multivariant analysis separated the groups on the basis of the outcome variables (P less than .0001). The control patients required ventilatory assistance, antibiotics, and diuretics more frequently than patients in the IP group. These data suggest that intercessory prayer to the Judeo-Christian God has a beneficial therapeutic effect in patients admitted to a CCU.’  Sounds good! - but Byrd was criticised for not being more transparent about the highly selective nature of reported positive outcomes.

Hi Mike, I hope you’re well! I agree with your statement about subjectivity - prayer’s effects have got to be more than subjective. But my point is that the objectivity of prayer isn’t about a simple mechanical “cause and effect” thing - it comes from the fact that we pray as children to our heavenly Father who is at one and the same time the creator, sustainer and judge of our world. To try to measure the objective effects of prayer divorced from their relational context is, therefore, a highly dubious exercise at best.

As to your question about an outsider trying to size up my effectiveness as a dad by observing my responsiveness to my children - a couple of points. Firstly, my response to my children is primarily for the sake of my relationship with my children, not primarily for the sake of outsiders. And secondly - if outsiders were trying to assess me purely on the basis of how I react to some such bizarre experiment, I would say that such outsiders are completely misguided and need to take a reality check. If they really want to see what I’m like as a Father, they should hang around with my family for a while and observe my normal interactions with my kids. To push the analogy into the realm of God, prayer and evangelism - the best way for outsiders to see how good God is as a Father is not to conduct a clinical “prayer experiment”, but to observe real family interactions between God and his children. Primarily between God and his one and only Son - e.g. we could point them to Jesus’ prayer in John 17 and help them to reflect on how God has responded to that prayer, both in the life of his Son and in the lives of his children ever since.

Andrew Gleeson05/05/2008 04:06 PM

Mike Paget asks apropos of my comment: Is the only important efficacity of prayer in relation to the believer?

I was careful to say that sometimes there are healings in response to prayer. What I question is whether that sort of success is the only or most important criterion of prayer’s worth. Are all the prayers that are not met to be regarded as a waste of time? That doesn’t mean their value must consist just “in relation to the believer”. Prayer is a way of glorifying God, and that is never a waste.

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
The Briefing: 21 years on CD-ROM

Sponsors

Briefing cover

The Sola Panel

The Briefing

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Karen Beilharz on A Vine confabulation

Michael L. Johnson on A Vine confabulation

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Lionel Windsor on God, the universe and all that: Part 3

Current discussions

RSS logo

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 (11 comments)

A Vine confabulation (3 comments)

Stark treatment of the Crusades (2 comments)

God, the universe and all that: Part 2 (1 comment)

God, the universe and all that: Part 5 (0 comments)

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

God, the universe and all that: Part 5 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In this fifth and final instalment of his five-part series, Lionel Windsor reveals what the solution to … more

Experiencing God by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). If you've just joined us, in these Saturday posts we've been looking at classics from The Briefing archive … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 4 by Lionel Windsor (0 comments). In the fourth instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor uncovers the answer to the riddle. (Read … more

A Vine confabulation by Ian Carmichael (3 comments). We at Matthias Media have recently made available a free and downloadable discussion guide for Col Marshall and Tony Payne's … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 3 by Lionel Windsor (11 comments). In the third instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor discovers we humans are significant in the … more

Kids@church/Click: Some great material for your children’s Sunday School by Jean Williams (0 comments). I teach Sunday School for children regularly, but I don't always have the time and energy to write my … more

Experiencing confusion by Karen Beilharz (0 comments). I mentioned in my last Saturday post that for the next little while, we would be looking at … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 2 by Lionel Windsor (1 comment). In the second instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor contemplates the extent of our significance in … more

Stark treatment of the Crusades by Peter Bolt (2 comments). Revisionist history is probably as common as it is unethical. There are lessons to learn from the past, but … more

God, the universe and all that: Part 1 by Lionel Windsor (7 comments). In the first instalment of a five-part series, Lionel Windsor ponders what astronomy has to teach us. … more

Ministry partners