A freebie for you: Jonah in the ESV Gordon Cheng

Here at Matthias Media, we read and recommend the English Standard Version Bible (ESV) as a superior English translation of both Old and New Testaments. So it was with interest and some nervousness that I heard that there is coming, just around the corner now, a new ESV Bible: the ESV Study Bible. It was with interest because, well, it's interesting; nervousness because Study Bibles, no matter how terrific they are, are the bane of every Bible study leader's life. When you ask “What does the text say?”, there will always always be one nerdy member of the group who will say, “Well, it says here in the explanatory notes that ...”. The faint thumping sound you hear next is me hitting myself upside of the head prior to saying, “Yes, that's great, and thank you, but WHAT DOES THE TEXT SAY?!?!?”, veins bulging on my neck and eyes popping out of my head. My Bible studies, at least, can be intense affairs.

And I'm afraid that I feel even more irritated when the explanatory notes have got it right—irritated because it robs me of one of the many reasons for telling people to ignore them and READ THE BIBLE PRAYERFULLY FOR THEMSELVES. YES I'M SHOUTING. SORRY ABOUT THAT. THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT.

So I haven't yet had a good look at the full ESV Study Bible—largely because it is not due for release until October 15 this year, but also because I am profoundly bigoted against any scribbles in the margin of my Bible that do not emanate from my pen.

That said, I am disappointed to tell you that, having looked through the free download of the notes on Jonah and enjoyed the interview with author Mark Futato, it's pretty darn good so far.

Futato acknowledges in the notes that some people think Jonah is a fishy story (sorry) that couldn't possibly have happened, but essentially dismisses such speculations as irrelevant to the understanding and application of the message itself, which (he points out) has all the hallmarks of prophetic narrative. In a few concise words, he explains why he thinks it unlikely that the story is allegory or fiction.

What I enjoyed about Futato's notes was his obvious attention to detail and his ability to summarize briefly why Jonah ought to be read as satire. This is a prophet that God has decided to have fun with, largely because Jonah is as bigoted as a red-haired politician from a minor political party in country Queensland. (Which, if you're not sure, is very.) Jonah ends, as Mark Futato observes in his interview, “with the Lord asking Jonah for permission to have compassion on the Ninevites”. To quote Daffy Duck, it is to laugh. And to quote me, it is a sharp little prod about how compassionate we are towards those who are under God's judgement—or even to what extent we realize that we ourselves need to receive God's compassion through his Son. Futato also talks about Jonah's fulfilment in Jesus, but check the notes for that. (Which, if the linked notes accurately represent what the final product will look like, will be quite difficult to use as cheat sheets during the heat of an intense Bible study, though they will be quite useful for any group member who does their preparation in advance. Yes!)

Anyway, on the principle that reviews ought to be shorter than the thing they are reviewing, I'll stop there and encourage you to get your own free download of the notes on Jonah. Thanks, ESV people!

Oh, and Justin Taylor of Crossway books tells me that the notes on Esther are done by Moore College lecturer Barry Webb, so I am looking forward to seeing them too, unfortunately.

10 Comments »

The Future of Jesus
Briefing cover

The Sola Panel

The Briefing

Current issue

Totally depraved

Recent comments

RSS logo

Mikey Lynch on Excuse me, but what's ‘mission’? (04/12/2008).

Nigel Statham on The second commandment (03/12/2008).

Dave Woolcott on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).

sandy Grant on The second commandment (03/12/2008).

Sandy Grant on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).

Ben Hudson on Job and prayer (03/12/2008).

Dave Woolcott on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).

Sandy Grant on Evaluating truth (03/12/2008).

Brad Hansen on Getting rid of the killer but (03/12/2008).

Paul Grimmond on Getting rid of the killer but (03/12/2008).

Recent posts

RSS logo

Excuse me, but what’s ‘mission’? by Peter Sholl (1 comment). As a new missionary visiting a church recently, this was a question asked by one keen enquirer. He explained that he … more

The second commandment by Lionel Windsor (2 comments). Church as we know it can sometimes be a bit weird and jarring. A few weeks ago at church, we heard … more

Getting rid of the killer but by Paul Grimmond (8 comments). I admit it, the title is a serious temptation: I feel an overwhelming desire to make bad jokes about posteriors (perhaps … more

What are we doing anyway? by Tony Payne (11 comments). One of the pitfalls most non-profit organizations fall into at one stage or another is endless discussion about vision and mission … more

Factotum #2 by Paul Grimmond (2 comments). Here is the next one in our line of Saturday blasts from the past. If you're new to us, let me … more

You must read this book by Gordon Cheng (0 comments). I am struggling to find reasons to avoid reading a few things, including a small pile next to the bed, and … more

Evaluating truth by Paul Grimmond (17 comments). I spent two days last week at a writing conference. It was a great couple of days, and I learned … more

Christian ministry and normal Christians by Tony Payne (19 comments). I count it one of the privileges of my life to have grown up in a time and a place when … more

An interview with Jean Williams by Sandy Grant (7 comments). Today we interview Jean Williams. Jean, how did you come to Christ? It's not an exciting story, but in … more

Guilt-edged pages? by Nicole Starling (5 comments). While ploughing my way through The Shack1 recently (and it was a matter of ploughing my … more